Navigating SEC registration, exemptions, and ongoing compliance obligations
Venture capital funds operate within a regulatory framework that differs meaningfully from other private fund structures. The SEC provides specific exemptions and accommodations for qualifying VC funds, though these come with their own requirements and limitations. Understanding the compliance landscape helps fund managers structure operations appropriately and avoid regulatory pitfalls.
Most venture capital fund managers rely on one of two primary exemptions from Investment Advisers Act registration. The Venture Capital Fund Adviser Exemption under Rule 203(l)-1 permits managers who solely advise qualifying venture capital funds to avoid SEC registration entirely, though they must still file as exempt reporting advisers. Alternatively, the Private Fund Adviser Exemption under Rule 203(m)-1 allows managers with less than $150 million in private fund assets under management in the United States to remain unregistered.
The venture capital fund exemption carries specific requirements. Qualifying funds must invest at least 80% of capital in qualifying investments—generally equity securities issued directly by qualifying portfolio companies. Funds cannot provide investors with redemption rights, and leverage is significantly restricted. Managers relying on this exemption should carefully monitor fund activities to ensure ongoing compliance with these conditions.
Venture capital managers may face state-level registration requirements depending on where they operate and where their investors are located. State blue sky laws vary considerably, and exemptions from federal registration do not automatically provide exemption from state requirements. Many states have notice filing requirements for private fund offerings conducted within their borders.
Beyond regulatory filings, compliance encompasses adherence to fund governing documents. The Limited Partnership Agreement establishes investment restrictions, conflict of interest policies, and LP consent requirements that create binding compliance obligations. Systematic monitoring of LPA compliance helps prevent inadvertent breaches that could trigger LP remedies or damage manager reputation.
Side letters present particular compliance challenges. These agreements may modify standard LPA terms for specific investors, creating a patchwork of obligations that must be tracked and honored. Large institutional investors often negotiate for most favored nations clauses, transparency rights, or co-investment preferences that require ongoing attention.
Venture capital presents numerous potential conflicts that require policies and procedures. Co-investment allocation among funds and LPs, follow-on investment decisions, allocation of management and partner time, and relationships with portfolio companies all create situations where manager and investor interests could diverge. Documenting policies for handling these situations and maintaining records of conflict resolutions provides important protection.
The appropriate compliance infrastructure depends on fund size and complexity. Smaller managers often designate an existing team member as Chief Compliance Officer and supplement internal resources with outside compliance consultants. Larger organizations may justify dedicated compliance staff. Regardless of structure, the compliance function should include:
Compliance requirements for venture capital funds continue to evolve as regulators increase oversight of private markets. Building appropriate infrastructure from fund inception positions managers to handle current obligations while adapting to future regulatory changes.